Assuming that Republicans can form a cohesive message, one that adheres to conservative principles of limited government and low taxation, I can foresee only one of two candidates: Mitt Romney or Sarah Palin (and the latter is most definitely my choice). I would like to say that a Palin/Romney ticket would be perfect, but I would rather a more seasoned Washingtonian as a running mate (for either one). John Kyl would be a nice selection at a VP candidate.
That said, it's too early to tell -- we don't even know who will be running against HRH Obama. He will lose in 2012, of that I am certain.
A former state governor with a track record of both independent thought and fiscal conservatism, coupled with a moral compass and an ability to connect with 'everyday' Americans is the person most likely to win. Today we're seeing just such a race unfolding in Massachusetts, as Scott Brown (R) has a lead over Martha Coakley (D) just prior to today's crucial vote for the Senate seat previously held by Ted Kennedy. Scott Brown is not a 'party line' Republican, or a hard-core conservative, but close; he's considered an independent thinker and is wholly against a bloated federal government, which seems to appeal to a great number of the citizens of Massachusetts.
We're seeing what a nobody does once in the office of President, a former 'community organizer' (read: agitator) without ANY governing experience.. capable only of teleprompter-aided soundbites and possessed of an unwavering belief in his own greatness, he thinks he was elected to 'rule' rather than to 'govern'. He's incapable of an original thought which did not come from Saul Alinsky's playbook, intolerant of those with whom he disagrees (both politicians and the citizenry), and utterly out of touch with the needs of the average American.
How's that working out for the country?
Posts
