Slavery Reparations

Slavery was an abomination. There's no morality-based argument that can justify slavery and its attendant evils. A case cannot be made for reparation payments to slave descendants.

Adjoa Aiyetoro, a legal consultant to the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America, said: "We're not raising claims that you should pay us because you did something to us 150 years ago. We are saying that we are injured today by the vestiges of slavery, which took away income and property that was rightfully ours."

This vestige-of-slavery argument, as an explanation for the pathology seen in some black neighborhoods, is simply nonsense when you think about it.

Illegitimacy among blacks today is 70 percent. Only 41 percent of black males 15 years and older are married, and only 36 percent of black children live in two-parent families. These and other indicators of family instability and its accompanying socioeconomic factors (such as high crime, welfare dependency and poor educational achievement) is claimed to be the legacy and vestiges of slavery, for which black Americans are due reparations. Let's look at it.

In 1940, illegitimacy among blacks was 19 percent. From 1890 to 1940, blacks had a marriage rate slightly higher than whites. As of 1950, 64 percent black males 15 years and older were married, compared to today's 41 percent.

In Philadelphia, in 1880, two-parent family structure was: black (75.2 percent), Irish (82.2 percent), German (84.5 percent) and native white Americans (73.1 percent). In other large cities such as Detroit, New York and Cleveland, we find roughly the same numbers.

According to one study of black families (Herbert G. Gutman, "The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925"): "Five out of six children under the age of 6 lived with both parents."

That study also found that, in Harlem between 1905 and 1925, only 3 percent of all families were headed by a woman under 30 and 85 percent of black children lived in two-parent families.

The question raised by these historical facts is: If what we see today in many black neighborhoods, as claimed by reparation advocates, are the vestiges and legacies of slavery, how come that social pathology wasn't much worse when blacks were just two or three generations out of slavery? Might it be that slavery's legacy and vestiges have a way, like diabetes, of skipping generations? In other words, for example, that devastating 70 percent rate of black illegitimacy simply skipped six generations -- it's a delayed effect of slavery.

I doubt whether the reparations gang could develop a coherent theory of the generation-skipping effects of slavery. Vestiges and legacy of slavery arguments are simply covers for another hustle similar to the $6 trillion dollar War on Poverty hustle.

Further, the case for ameliorating white guilt regarding the vestiges of slavery has been a mixed success: Affirmative Action, here defined as a situation where a white candidate and a black candidate are equal in qualifications for university admission or employment, and the preference should be given to the black candidate. While it appeared on the surface that affirmative action policies were successful - based on the numbers of minority students gaining acceptance to colleges and universities, despite lower-than-acceptable scores normally used to secure such acceptance - the dropout and failure rates for those students was so high as to negate the policy's existence almost entirely. Though there have been some success stories, they are individual and few; instead, what has come to light is the horribly inadequate PRE-college education prevalent in public schools.

Far from the federal government abandoning anyone, the opposite is true: The War on Poverty and Affirmative Action were ill-conceived, though perhaps well-meaning, attempts at leveling what some felt was a tilted playing field - at a cost of trillions of taxpayer dollars.